Friday, January 29, 2010

The Best Reason I've Heard For The U.S. To Get Out Of The Middle East

Nonie Darwish was asked by Frontpage Magazine: "What can Westerners do to help inflict cracks into the Islamic Curtain?"

The first thing is get out of the way when Islam is about to explode, and it will. Muslim countries need not be rescued and they need to fall on their own and grow on their own. Do not try to help or hurt if a civil war happens in Saudi Arabia or Egypt. If we cannot have oil for a while, then let it be. When we try to help a Muslim country from self -destruction, due to Muslim on Muslim atrocities, like what happened to Kuwait by Iraq, we take away their ability to recognize their internal issues, see their true enemies and why they are in trouble.

The West must realize that it is not doing itself or the Muslim world a favor by political correctness — which actually has a negative effect on Muslims trying to reform their system. Western PC is telling them we just love you the way you are, terrorism, hate speech, good and bad, we still love you. The West must demand reciprocity and equal treatment from Muslim countries. If they build mosques in the US then we must have the right to build a Church in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries. By accepting a one way cultural impact from Islam, we are welcoming a disaster waiting to happen.

Read the entire Frontpage Magazine interview with Nonie Darwish HERE.

(Hat Tip: Howie at The Jawa Report)

Monday, January 25, 2010

Ummat al-Kuffar

"Ummat al-Kuffar" means the worldwide community of al-Kuffar.

Use of the term "Ummat" is most important as it shows we are united and stand together: United in the face of adversity. Supporting each other without hesitation or fear when it comes to our fundamental freedoms and genuine human rights.

Agnostics, Atheists, Bahá'ís, Buddhists, Christians (of all denominations), Confucianists, Deists, Hindus, Humanists, Jains, Jews, Mormons, Pagans, Pantheists, Rastafarians, Sikhs, Taoists... and indeed all of humanity in all of its wonderful diversity and brilliance UNITED & TOGETHER, SUPPORTING & PROTECTING EACH OTHER FROM THE OTHERWISE RELENTLESS MARCH OF ISLAMISATION

We're not interested in the "Politically Correct"; we're passionate about What's right!

Learn more about Ummat al-Kuffar. JOIN TODAY!

It's The JOOS Fault!

A new Lancet study claims Palestinian men are beating their wives because of Israel.

I kid you not.

They are blaming domestic violence in an Islamic society on Jews. Certainly, it wouldn't have anything to do with this:

"Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great." (Quran 4:34)

And it certainly couldn't have anything to do with countless accounts in the Hadith in which Muhammad approved of, or turned a blind at, his followers beating their wives. It is very unlikely that it has anything to do with Islam's perfect example himself beating his own wife.

And it doesn't matter that these findings directly conflict with this extensive study.


It's the JOOS fault.

PajamasMedia has more on this story.

(Cross-posted at and Avid Editor's Insights)

Secret Al Qaida Training Camp Video Discovered

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Saturday, January 23, 2010

When Are You Living In An Islamic Country?

From Gates of Vienna via a tweet from Infidel's Are Cool -

The quotes below are from a translated interview with Afshin Ellian, who will be called as a witness in the Wilders trial by Bram Moszkovicz:

You said the Wilders Trial reminds you of justice in your country of origin, Iran. Is that not somewhat exaggerated?

"The Netherlands, of course, is not comparable with Iran, but it’s about perception. If you cannot say that Islam is a backward religion and that Mohammed is a criminal, then you are living in an Islamic country, my friend, because there also you cannot say such things. Here I’m free to say that Christ was a faggot* and Mary was a whore, but apparently I should stay off of Mohammed."

Boycott Israel

As a public service for my anti-Semitic readers, I've decided to post this video to help you boycott Israeli products.

Mazel tov!

(Cross-posted at and Avid Editor's Insights))

What The West Needs To Understand About Islam

If the West is to remain truly democratic, rational and valid criticism of Islam is a must...

How unfortunate it is that whenever someone attempts to show the facts of true Muhammadan Islam in unflattering manner in a public forum, he risks being tortured or killed by pious Muslims, even in the West. Alas!

The Muslim Ummah is utterly intolerant to criticisms of the Quran, Prophet Muhammad and Islam. Nonetheless, there are individuals who are brave enough to face the challenge of exercising their freedom of speech, their freedom of expression. Ibn-Waraq, Ayan Hisri Ali, Wafa Sultan and Maryam Namazie are some of the courageous individuals, who have chosen not to indulge in appeasing Muslims and political correctness. They have chosen to speak the historical, factual truth about Muhammadan Islam. And, unsurprisingly, they have been living under constant danger to their lives.

Another brave individual is the Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard. He drew the cartoons of Muhammad that appeared in a Danish newspaper in 2006 that hurled the entire Muslim world into violent frenzy. They started demonstrations and demanded death of the cartoonists and their publishers. On January 2, 2010, a Somali man, armed with axe and knife, entered Westergaar’s house and tried to kill him. This incident prompted me to write this article.

Muhammad cartoonThe reason for the attempted murder of Westergaar is his comical depiction of Muhammad, produced here.

He has drawn other depictions of Muhammad as well. It’s interesting to note that although the illustration may appear somewhat derogatory toward Muhammad, but it does make an accurate point in artistic form, i.e. the blood-soaked and war-filled life of Muhammad. That is exactly what the bomb depicts. I personally believe that it’s not inflammatory at all; it just makes a true representation of Muhammad in pictorial form.

This incident entails a number of issues within the context of western nations and within the context of a truly democratic set-up, which I will address in this article.

First: Why criticize Islam? And why should non-Muslims/atheists etc. indulge in such criticisms and ‘inflammatory actions’ when it’s already given that Muslim world will react violently.

Second: What is the use of such ‘transgressions,’ i.e. what good will come out of it?

Read the rest at Islam-Watch.

(Hat Tip: Atlas Shrugs)

Friday, January 22, 2010

Sickness Of The Left

This post is almost too vile to publish.

Jack Cafferty of posted an editorial about a 13-year-old Saudi girl sentenced to 90 lashes for carrying a cell phone to school. The punishment is harsher than many Saudi thieves receive. She could very well die during the lashing.

The editorial goes on to point out how women are often treated as second-class citizens, with few rights.

Cafferty asks readers to respond to this question: What does it say when America’s ally Saudi Arabia sentences a 13-year-old girl to 90 lashes after bringing a cell phone to school?

The story is disturbing enough. But even more so, are the responses of CNN readers, most who live in America - the one country that rightfully condemns human rights abuses - more than any other.

Some response examples:

"We should respect the cultures of other countries as well as the rules of the school Both of which come above all else." - Mehra

"they know how to run a school. we should take note." - paul

"We need to hire Saudi teachers for our inner city schools. A few decapitations and all our problems would be solved." Mike, Syracuse, NY

"Because they enforce their laws, they do not have the crime issues we do so you can draw your own conclusions from that." - Doug, Dallas, Tx

"Good for Saudi Arabia. Go to school to learn, not talk on the phone or play games, what a novel idea." - Larry from Georgetown, TX

"It says we should 'MIND OUR OWN BUSINESS". Other countries have their own laws and customs and not every country conforms to our beliefs." - Sandy

"Their country and their laws, like it or not. I am sure we have laws that are offensive to people in other countries, including to our allies." - Mike from Denver

"It's none of our business how anybody raise their kids cause what works for one household may not work for the other so sometimes we have to be a little bit stricter but it all should be done in love and not of appearance to the public eyes" - Frandy

"Do you REALLY believe that the Saudis are going to lash this girl so bad that she is going to die or be really hurt? Come On!!! They just want to teach her a lesson. They have laws just like we do. There are broken and you pay the price. I was spanked in Elementary school with a big wooden board. It hurt! It was suppose too!" - Gayle G.

The last just shows how utterly clueless the left is about Islam... Gayle G. simply doesn't understand what an Islamic lashing is. This idiot seems to think a lashing is no worse than a paddling. That ignorance may explain the apathy displayed by many commenters in this thread. Gayle G. comments again:

"Like some people have said on here, the Muslims don't want their women running around without clothes on like in the U.S. and they don't want millons of people locked up in prisons. You do the crime and you pay a price, a big price." -Gayle G.

Yet another shining example of ignorance. Apparently Gayle G. has no problem with the ownership of women - slavery. She seems to support muslims controlling "their women" to suit the desires of their male owners. She also has no clue about the Islamic "justice" system, which often finds innocent people guilty of crimes based solely on sworn testimonies by vindictive, nefarious individuals.

It is people like Gayle G. who blindly continue to embrace the politically correct idea that religious extremism is shared equally among all faiths, and that Islam is peaceful, despite the behaviors and words of millions of muslims around the world and despite being disproportionately represented in acts of terrorism.

Liberal leaning CNN's audience is mostly democratic - the party of compassion (so it claims). Reading though these comments, however, one can see there is very little compassion or understanding for those helpless individuals living outside the limited, narcissistic world of the liberal mind.

(Cross-posted at and Avid Editor's Insights)

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Islam On Trial

(Hat Tip: Jihad Watch)

Many thanks to, via Jihad Watch, for the English translation (all emphasis mine):

Mister Speaker, judges of the court,

I would like to make use of my right to speak for a few minutes.

Freedom is the most precious of all our attainments and the most vulnerable. People have devoted their lives to it and given their lives for it. Our freedom in this country is the outcome of centuries. It is the consequence of a history that knows no equal and has brought us to where we are now.

I believe with all my heart and soul that the freedom in the Netherlands is threatened. That what our heritage is, what generations could only dream about, that this freedom is no longer a given, no longer self-evident.

I devote my life to the defence of our freedom. I know what the risks are and I pay a price for it every day. I do not complain about it; it is my own decision. I see that as my duty and it is why I am standing here.

I know that the words I use are sometimes harsh, but they are never rash. It is not my intention to spare the ideology of conquest and destruction, but I am not any more out to offend people. I have nothing against Muslims. I have a problem with Islam and the Islamization of our country because Islam is at odds with freedom.

Future generations will wonder to themselves how we in 2010, in this place, in this room, earned our most precious attainment. Whether there is freedom in this debate for both parties and thus also for the critics of Islam, or that only one side of the discussion may be heard in the Netherlands? Whether freedom of speech in the Netherlands applies to everyone or only to a few? The answer to this is at once the answer to the question whether freedom still has a home in this country.

Freedom was never the property of a small group, but was always the heritage of us all. We are all blessed by it.

Lady Justice wears a blindfold, but she has splendid hearing. I hope that she hears the following sentences, loud and clear:

It is not only a right, but also the duty of free people to speak against every ideology that threatens freedom. Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States was right: The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

I hope that the freedom of speech shall triumph in this trial.

In conclusion, Mister Speaker, judges of the court.

This trial is obviously about the freedom of speech. But this trial is also about the process of establishing the truth. Are the statements that I have made and the comparisons that I have taken, as cited in the summons, true? If something is true then can it still be punishable? This is why I urge you to not only submit to my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of freedom of speech. But I ask you explicitly to honour my request to hear witnesses and experts on the subject of Islam. I refer not only to Mister Jansen and Mister Admiraal, but also to the witness/experts from Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Without these witnesses, I cannot defend myself properly and, in my opinion, this would not be an fair trial.

Freedom Of Speech On Trial

Today, the freedom of speech is on trial in the Netherlands. The outcome will affect us all. As Pam Geller at Atlas Shrugs writes:

On the 20th of January the trial against Wilders, and western civilization, will begin. It is quite likely that Wilders will go to jail for speaking the truth. Criminalizing free speech. If Wilders can be sent to jail for "hate speech", I can be sent to jail. If I can be sent to jail, you can be sent to jail.

This is not about Wilders. It is about our very way of life, our civilization and our unalienable rights. It is ironic to me that his trial begins on the first anniversary of the inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama, an opponent of American rule of law. Obama was the first President to co-sponsor a UN resolution criminalizing free speech. And while the media failed, yet again, to cover this historic development, it is, in a word, cataclysmic.

(Emphasis Pam's)

Atlas Shrugs also has live coverage.

Fitna, the short film that started it all:

Download it, save it, share it.

(Image by Bosch)

(Cross-posted at and Avid Editor's Insights)

Monday, January 18, 2010

A Message From Ali Sina

Hat Tip: Atlas Shrugs

Mr. Zameer Ahmed Jumlana, Secretary of All India Committee, Indian National League, to the Commissioner of Delhi Police, India, has filed a formal complaint against Faith Freedom International.

Ali Sina, creator and operator of Faith Freedom International, responds:

Dear Mr. Zameer Ahmed Jumlana,

Showing the pictures of Muhammad is forbidden by the teachings of Islam. However, we are not Muslims and we do not abide by the teachings of Islam. Isn't it absurd that you expect everyone to live by your dictums?

Muslims are in violation of the laws that are the hallmark of the civilized people, such as the Golden Rule, the Human Rights, the equality of genders, the freedom of speech, the freedom of belief, etc. These are the laws that matter to us. They don't matter to you, because they are not part of your laws.

Just as you file a complaint against us for violating your laws, we are taking you to court for violating our laws.

Which court? The court of the public opinion! It is in this court that we are exposing the deception, the violence, and the hate that is so intrinsic in the religion that you espouse. We are fighting the lies of Islam with truth and winning the minds and hearts of thousands of people, both Muslims and non-Muslims.

Can you defend Islam? Can you prove that what we allege against your faith and its monstrous prophet are untrue? No you cannot. When it comes to logic you are helpless. You cannot defend your evil belief with logic. There is nothing you can do, but to bring legal charges to stop us from revealing the truth about your cherished faith.

You can’t. There is no law that can stop us from telling the truth about any faith, at least not where I live. Here we practice freedom of speech and criticizing religions, including Islam is our birth right.

This is the freedom that you Muslims have always enjoyed, but have denied to others. You think it is okay to destroy churches, synagogues, temples and the houses of worships of other faiths, trash their religions and criticize them. You think it is okay for your prophet to call the Jews, maghdhoob (hated by God), the Christians, gone astray and the Hindus, polytheists and najes (filthy), but you cry like a baby when someone criticizes your faith.

Read the rest at Faith Freedom International.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Democratic Birthday Card

Click over to Kirly (Not A Bald Stooge) to read the hilarious inside!

(Cross-posted at

Anti-Pirate Measures

Pirates have been successful in their most recent hijacking, receiving a hefty ransom of $7 million dollars.

Might I suggest a much more economical alternative:

It's a Bushmaster MK44 30mm Cannon. At an average unit cost of only $267,000, this investment would protect 26 ships and/or tankers transporting loads in the dangerous waters off Somalia for the same price as the ransom paid.

Check out The Bushmaster MK44 30mm cannon's power:

Check out it's awesome power in action:

Just saying...